A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Advancing Childhood Cancer Research by Providing the Path to Structured, Mineable, AI-ready Data
Modern technology advancements, specifically in the area of medical imaging, have substantially improved the evaluation of therapy response and the…
Launch of the Bavarian Oncology Radiology Network (BORN) Project
Improving the diagnosis and treatment of cancer patients by harnessing the potential of digitalization and standardization is the ultimate ambition of…
Scientifically proven benefits of mint Lesion™ in clinical routine
In contrast to clinical trials, unstructured free-text reporting is still common in the clinical routine. Such reports often lack content and clarity,…