A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.

Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources

Improving Postoperative Brain Tumor MRI: TGSE-BLADE vs. RESOLVE DWI
Early MRI scans are critical for patients who have just undergone brain tumor resection to evaluate the surgery's success and plan future treatments.…

Centralized Management for Clinical Trial Communications and Workflows
Requests for radiological clinical trial evaluations frequently rely on fragmented methods such as emails, phone calls, and spreadsheets. This…

LMU University Hospital: Artificial Intelligence for TNM Staging in NSCLC – How Reliable Are AI-Based Segmentations?
The recent study “Artificial intelligence for TNM staging in NSCLC – a critical appraisal of segmentation utility in [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT” provides a…