A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.

Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources

LMU University Hospital: Artificial Intelligence for TNM Staging in NSCLC – How Reliable Are AI-Based Segmentations?
The recent study “Artificial intelligence for TNM staging in NSCLC – a critical appraisal of segmentation utility in [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT” provides a…

Successful “RECIST and Beyond” Workshop in Cologne: Advancing Precision in Oncologic Imaging
How can complex tumor findings be assessed accurately, reproducibly, and in line with clinical guidelines?

Implementing RANO 2.0 for Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials in mint Lesion
Tumor response assessment in neuro-oncology clinical trials requires careful attention to measurement protocols and confirmation scan requirements. To…