A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Systems on FHIR: Driving Healthcare Innovation Through Interoperability
Interoperability is revolutionizing healthcare by enabling the seamless exchange of patient data across systems. This efficient data flow is critical…
Human-AI Collaboration in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
As prostate cancer diagnosis becomes increasingly complex, the collaboration between human expertise and artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a…
Customizable reading templates for therapy response assessment
mint Lesion offers customizable reading templates for therapy response assessment in clinical care and research. Adapt parameters, define lesion…