A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.

Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources

Implementing RANO 2.0 for Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials in mint Lesion
Tumor response assessment in neuro-oncology clinical trials requires careful attention to measurement protocols and confirmation scan requirements. To…

RACOON – Imaging, Data & Collaboration for Better Decisions
Modern radiology faces a central question: how can imaging and clinical data be combined in a way that leads to more precise diagnoses,…

Rethinking Early Detection: How RACOON-MARDER Aims to Spot Liver Cancer Sooner
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often diagnosed too late, limiting treatment options and survival. The RACOON-MARDER project aims to change that. By…