Categories: iRECIST

Doctor looking at a CT scan in mint Lesion™

Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study

A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST…

Diagram that shows reduced reading times for the mint Lesion™ approach at both follow-ups.

UKE Hamburg: Study Shows that Software-Assisted Assessments Enhance iRECIST Evaluation

This research study [1] aimed to compare the feasibility and reliability of manual versus software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT)…

Two computer screens showing the mint Lesion™user interface: a comparison of scans and an evaluation as a diagram

Scientifically proven benefits of mint Lesion™ in clinical routine

In contrast to clinical trials, unstructured free-text reporting is still common in the clinical routine. Such reports often lack content and clarity,…

New iRECIST whitepaper published

We are happy to present our newly published whitepaper on iRECIST and its application. This is available here on our homepage as well as on www.irecis…

New iRECIST Oncologic Response Criteria already in clinical use at the University Medical Center – Tübingen, Germany

Shortly following the release of the new iRECIST- oncologic response criteria (Lancet Oncology, March 2017) the University Medical Center in Tübingen,…

Novel oncologic therapy response criteria (iRECIST and more)

Advances in oncology therapies, such as novel immune-related agents, require adapted and refined criteria and guidelines for the assessment and…