A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.

Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources

Rare Tumors, Big Goals: How RACOON-SAGA Aims to Improve Therapy Decisions
Rare tumors, major challenges: The RACOON-SAGA project explores how imaging and clinical data can improve the pre-therapeutic characterization of soft…

Structured Reporting and Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Diagnostics: An Interview with Prof. Dr. Thorsten Persigehl
What does radiology look like when structured reporting meets artificial intelligence? A look into the daily practice of Prof. Dr. Thorsten Persigehl…

RACOON SAGA: Interdisciplinary Research for Better Therapy Decisions in Sarcoma Treatment
Sarcomas are rare tumors that pose particular challenges to both medicine and research. Their heterogeneity makes precise diagnostics difficult, which…