A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.

Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources

Rethinking Early Detection: How RACOON-MARDER Aims to Spot Liver Cancer Sooner
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often diagnosed too late, limiting treatment options and survival. The RACOON-MARDER project aims to change that. By…

mint Lesion Research Suite: The Flexible Imaging Research Platform Built for Scalable, Single- and Multi-Center Studies
mint Lesion's Research Suite is an advanced imaging research platform designed to support academic teams in streamlining and scaling their imaging…

Structured Reporting and AI in Radiology: Efficiency and Quality in Prostate Diagnostics
How are structured reporting and artificial intelligence transforming radiology practice? Prof. Dr. Thorsten Persigehl from University Hospital…