A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
RACOON SAGA: Interdisciplinary Research for Better Therapy Decisions in Sarcoma Treatment
Sarcomas are rare tumors that pose particular challenges to both medicine and research. Their heterogeneity makes precise diagnostics difficult, which…
The Template Designer in Use: Interview with Dr. Madelaine Hettler
Structured, well-organized data are the foundation of meaningful research. But how can they be captured effectively in practice? Dr. Madelaine…
Research Insights: The Template Designer in Use
Structured and well-organized data are essential building blocks for successful research and clinical projects. The Template Designer provides a tool…