A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
University Hospital Tübingen: Neuro-Oncological Imaging with Deep Learning Reconstruction (DLR)
A recent study conducted by the University Hospital of Tübingen investigated the potential of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in magnetic resonance…
Project RACOON-RESCUE: Advancing Diagnosis and Treatment for Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL), a type of lymph node cancer, is the fourth most common tumor in children and adolescents. Radiological…
Structured Reporting Improves TNM Classification Accuracy and Radiologist Satisfaction
In a collaborative, multi-center study, radiology experts developed and validated in mint Lesion a software-assisted structured reporting (SR)…