A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
LMU Klinikum Munich: Monitoring Prostate Cancer Treatments with VTP and HIFU - The Use of Multiparametric MRI
The prospective study conducted by LMU Klinikum Munich investigates the treatment of localized prostate cancer using two techniques: vascular-targeted…
RACOON FADEN: Pioneering Early Detection of Adenomyosis – Insights from Prof. Mechsner (Charité Berlin) and Prof. May (University Hospital Erlangen)
Adenomyosis is a gynecological condition of the uterus and a form of endometriosis. Approximately 10 percent of women of reproductive age are affected…
Early Detection of Treatment Response in Lung Cancer Using Delta-Radiomics Features
The study conducted by Heidelberg University Hospital investigates the use of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) to predict early treatment outcomes in…