A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Structured Reporting in Radiology: Precision, Clarity, and Data Quality
Radiology reports are often the key to a diagnosis – and the way they are created and communicated makes a crucial difference. Traditional free-text…
Lung Cancer Screening in Germany – A Turning Point for Early Detection
Few topics are currently as impactful in radiology as lung cancer screening. From 2026, Germany is expected to roll out a nationwide program, marking…
Standardizing Oncological Imaging: The BORN Project
The BZKF BORN Project (Bavarian Oncological Radiology Network) is setting new standards in the collection and evaluation of oncological imaging data.…