A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Structured reports for better patient care in oncology
“mint Lesion™ enables us to make better reports because it truly provides all the necessary data for patient care.” Dr. Laurent Chapuis shares how…
Quantitative Tumorbegleitung und ihre Einbettung in holistische Befundstrukturen (Only in German)
Wie können die Ergebnisse software-unterstützter Tumorbeurteilung gewinnbringend in die Routine-Kommunikation mit den klinischen Zuweisern und…
Workflow optimization, increased efficiency and reduced errors in clinical trials
"It's a paradigm shift." This is how Prof. Ulf Teichgräber, Director of the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology at the University…