A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Customizing structured data collection with mint Lesion™ Template Editor
We are thrilled to announce a forthcoming addition to mint Lesion™: the Template Editor. This feature will transform the way users interact with our…
Improving Cancer Care Through Standardization: Interview with Prof. Thomas Kröncke on the BZKF Project BORN
The Bavaria-wide oncological radiology network (BORN) Project was launched on August 1, 2022, with the objective of improving cancer care in Bavaria…
Optimizing Clinical Trials without Compromising Patient Care: An Investigational Site’s Perspective
Attracting and retaining industry-sponsored clinical trials can be quite appealing for healthcare institutions. Besides obvious financial and…