Enhancing flexibility and communication while saving costs and time in clinical trials

Emily Ferris and Alex Arbuckle describe how using mint Lesion™ has enhanced their clinical trial operations, enabling “a more cooperative approach between [their] radiologists and oncologists” while simultaneously saving time and reducing costs.
 
Faced with a multitude of clinical trial site reads each day, Ms. Ferris and Mr. Arbuckle explain how they benefit from a more efficient workflow by using a dedicated software platform which provides a comprehensive and compliant response assessment and supports them in maintaining oversight of clinical trial imaging analysis design.
 
Ms. Ferris is a Lead Image Analyst and Mr. Arbuckle is a Clinical Research Imaging Core Manager at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center.

Related Resources

Related Resources

Picture shows a scan of pericardial effusion

RACOON: Study emphasizes the clinical relevance of pericardial effusion as an imaging biomarker in COVID-19 patients

A multicenter study [1] based on the German research infrastructure project RACOON (Radiological Cooperative Network of the COVID-19 pandemic; a Netzw…

Doctor looking at a CT scan in mint Lesion™

Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study

A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST…

Diagram that shows reduced reading times for the mint Lesion™ approach at both follow-ups.

UKE Hamburg: Study Shows that Software-Assisted Assessments Enhance iRECIST Evaluation

This research study [1] aimed to compare the feasibility and reliability of manual versus software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT)…