A recent retrospective study led by Dr. Marilyn J. Siegel and her team at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis has shed light on a critical issue in cancer care: routine clinical reads are more prone to overdiagnosing progressive disease when compared to RECIST 1.1 interpretations. This discrepancy holds significant implications, potentially leading to the premature discontinuation of effective treatments for cancer clinical trial participants and patients under standard care.
In this study, mint Lesion software was utilized for the criteria-based reads, determining overall response assessments according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, and generating structured reports for the clinical trial's principal investigator.
To learn more about the study's insights into the discrepant assessments and the suggested steps for mitigating this issue, click here.
Study Discovers Overdiagnosis of Progressive Cancer in Routine Clinical Evaluations
Related Resources
Related Resources
RACOON FADEN Project Tackles Early Detection of Adenomyosis
Endometriosis is a vastly under-researched condition affecting women, but it is finally receiving the attention it deserves through the RACOON FADEN…
Use of Multiparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Prospective Study
The prospective study conducted by LMU Klinikum München investigates the effectiveness of vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) and…
LMU Klinikum Munich: Monitoring Prostate Cancer Treatments with VTP and HIFU - The Use of Multiparametric MRI
The prospective study conducted by LMU Klinikum Munich investigates the treatment of localized prostate cancer using two techniques: vascular-targeted…