A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Mint Medical provides a reading template for the standardized assessment and documentation of COVID-19 disease (coronavirus) based on CT imaging
Heidelberg, GER – Mint Medical GmbH, a global MedTech company specialized in software solutions for data-driven radiology, today announced that it…
Clear, consistent, and complete documentation of imaging-derived information
The radiology report is expected to provide information that impacts life changing treatment decisions at every cancer care step in which imaging is…
Real-world data to enhance clinical trial evidence
In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a vast proportion of patients does not meet the precise inclusion criteria. In oncology, for example,…