A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
mint PI-RADS V2 report as the standard for communication with urologists - Interview with PD Dr. Röthke
Since the beginning of 2017, all PI-RADS v2 reads are exclusively performed with mint Lesion™ by PD Dr. Matthias Röthke, Chief Medical Officer at…
Pancreas staging in clinical routine at University Hospital Innsbruck - Interview with PD Dr. Widmann
The University Hospital in Innsbruck, Austria, has been using mint Lesion™ since mid-2015 with the initial focus on clinical trials in order to…
Assessment time halved: Importance of a good tumor response assessment tool in clinical site reads
The Clinical Research Imaging Core (CRIC) of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (UWCCC) recently published a poster at the AACI CRI…