A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Mrs. Kelie Luby joins Mint Medical's team
Mrs. Kelie Luby will join Mint Medical’s team from January 2017 as new Vice President Clinical Trials Software and will be introduced at the upcoming…
Novel oncologic therapy response criteria (iRECIST and more)
Advances in oncology therapies, such as novel immune-related agents, require adapted and refined criteria and guidelines for the assessment and…
Customized templates in mint Lesion 3.3
mint Lesion™ 3.3 features a novel data and knowledge modelling core that enables you to customize read procedures and reporting templates – or design…