A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Recording of RSNA 2019 AI theater presentation | Power food for AI
At this year’s RSNA, Mint Medical presented its AI approach to the audience at the AI theater. Tobias Gottmann and Aditya Jayaram highlighted how…
Potential of longitudinal data from single site and multi-center clinical trials for AI-research
Prof. Dr. Hans-Christoph Becker from Stanford University, a long-standing user of mint Lesion™, shares his experience of using the software in this…
Home of excellence for cancer care innovation
In a multidisciplinary center that networks medical research, natural sciences, engineering sciences, computer science and business administration, in…