A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Creating evidence to tackle COVID-19
Our COVID-19 reading template is in use for two weeks, and its usage is multiplying. We are grateful for the close cooperation and feedback from…
Potential of using structured data from clinical trials and routine for AI and radiomics research
Dr. Nils Grosse Hokamp shares his experience of using mint Lesion™ at the University Hospital Cologne in this brief interview. He talks about how they…
Mint Medical provides a reading template for the standardized assessment and documentation of COVID-19 disease (coronavirus) based on CT imaging
In the first week of March, we will make the relevant software functions available for all our current users at no cost. We plan to offer the COVID-19…