A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
New mint Lesion 3.4 Software presented at RSNA 2017
With mint Lesion 3.4, reproducible assessment and structured reporting of significant image observations are easier than ever. Numerous improvements…
ESOI/EORTC Workshop in Barcelona: Participants practice tumour response assessment using mint Lesion™
The autumn workshop of the European Society of Oncological Imaging (ESOI) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)…
Mint Medical showcases MSK-Prototype at IMR 2017 in Hamburg
Mint Medical was one of the sponsors of the first Intensive course Musculoskeletal Radiology (IMR) which took place on September 8th and 9th 2017 in…