A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Study Highlights the Potential of Radiomics in Medical Intervention
A recent study conducted by the Medical University of Innsbruck highlights the potential of radiomics in exploring the impacts of Radiochemotherapy…
New Technique Speeds Up Whole-Body MRI for Children Without Sacrificing Image Quality, Study Finds
As we mark Childhood Cancer Awareness Month, we would like to highlight the progress achieved in the realm of cancer diagnostics. A recent study led…
Study Discovers Overdiagnosis of Progressive Cancer in Routine Clinical Evaluations
A recent retrospective study led by Dr. Marilyn J. Siegel and her team at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis has shed light on…