A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Structured Reporting of Solid and Cystic Pancreatic Lesions in CT and MRI: Consensus-Based Reporting Templates of the German Radiological Society (DRG)
During the daily clinical routine, radiological reports on pancreatic lesions are often written as freeform texts. This causes several problems, in…
University of Miami & Nova Souteastern University: Study shows feasibility of radiomics and T2 mapping as novel imaging biomarkers of activity in superficial fibromatosis
A retrospective study [1] conducted by researchers at University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Nova Southeastern University investigated…
The benefits of structured oncologic reporting with mint Lesion™
Dr. Damiano Caruso of Sapienza Universita di Roma recounts how he got to know mint Lesion™ at a workshop hosted by the ESOI. Among other workstations,…