A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Software-Assisted Structured Reporting Improves TNM Classification Accuracy in NSCLC Staging
In this multi-center collaboration, thoracic radiology experts developed and evaluated a software-assisted structured reporting (SR) framework for…
Leverage Advanced AI-Driven Nodule Detection and Analysis for Comprehensive Patient Care
Discover the power of streamlined AI-driven lung screening with contextflow ADVANCE Chest CT integrated into mint Lesion. With automated lung nodule…
Comparison of iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 for Evaluating Immunotherapy in Melanoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
In a retrospective study conducted at the University Hospital Cologne, the radiological criteria iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 were compared for assessing…