A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Royal Marsden London: Study shows prediction power of CT-based 2D and 3D texture analysis for liver metastases
In a retrospective study [1], a team from Royal Marsden in London and Sutton explored changes of CT texture analysis metrics in unresectable liver…
The Mint Experience of Dr. Stephen Raskin, Sheba Medical Center in Tel Aviv
From my initial experience with mint Lesion™ software, and over the time I have been using it, I have been pleased with the software and come to…
How mint Lesion 3.5 helps you to benefit from Artificial Intelligence in Radiology
According to researchers, every adult makes 35,000 decisions each day. While there are no numbers in literature about how many decisions a radiologist…