A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
University Hospital Jena: Study evaluated response rate and safety in patients with HCC treated with DEB-TACE using 40-µm microspheres
Researchers at the University Hospital Jena analyzed the response rate and safety of superselective drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization…
University Hospital Tübingen: Study examined correlation between 18f-fdg PET and CT texture parameters in metastatic melanoma patients
An exploratory study [1] conducted by researchers at University Hospital Tuebingen investigated whether CT texture analysis parameters correlate with…
mint Analytics: Real-time data visualization and analysis in clinical trials with imaging endpoints
We talked to PD Dr. Wolfgang G. Kunz, Head of Oncological Imaging and of the Oncological Study Center at the Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital…