A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
How to improve reading procedures and reduce errors in clinical trials with imaging endpoints
Dr. Laura Oleaga from Hospital Clinìc de Barcelona explains how she and her team have benefitted from implementing mint Lesion™ in the face of an…
LMU University Hospital Munich: Real-time Data Visualization and Analysis in Clinical Ttrials with Imaging Endpoints
“mint Analytics expands your means of structured response assessment in mint Lesion™ by instantaneous visualization of the collected data, as a whole…
Objective, reproducible, and trustworthy data in clinical trials with imaging endpoints
Dr. Anthony Tolcher, medical oncologist and CEO of NEXT Oncology, spoke to us about objectivity as one of the biggest challenges in clinical trials…