How to improve reading procedures and reduce errors in clinical trials with imaging endpoints

Dr. Laura Oleaga from Hospital Clinìc de Barcelona explains how she and her team have benefitted from implementing mint Lesion™ in the face of an increasing volume of clinical trials. She highlights how standardized reading procedures and reports limit the possibility of errors in clinical trial work, improve the communication between radiology and oncology, and deliver the necessary documentation for trial audits.

 
Moreover, she decsribes the potential that arises by using mint Lesion™ in their clinical routine – extending clinical trial excellence to the routine care of each oncological patient.

Related Resources

Related Resources

WUSTL: Discrepant Assessments of Progressive Disease in Clinical Trials between Routine Clinical Reads and Formal RECIST 1.1 Interpretations

In this retrospective study utilizing the mint Lesion™ software[1], researchers found that routine clinical interpretations frequently resulted in the…

Early lung cancer detection through LDCT screening as a potential way to improve patient outcomes in Germany

The establishment of a nation-wide lung cancer screening program in Germany has been a subject of considerable interest and debate among healthcare…

Tumor Growth Rate Modeling: A Novel Approach to Evaluating the Efficacy of Cancer Therapies

The 2020 review of Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administrative Approval of Novel Cancer Therapies Between 2000 and 2016…