How to improve reading procedures and reduce errors in clinical trials with imaging endpoints

Dr. Laura Oleaga from Hospital Clinìc de Barcelona explains how she and her team have benefitted from implementing mint Lesion™ in the face of an increasing volume of clinical trials. She highlights how standardized reading procedures and reports limit the possibility of errors in clinical trial work, improve the communication between radiology and oncology, and deliver the necessary documentation for trial audits.

 
Moreover, she decsribes the potential that arises by using mint Lesion™ in their clinical routine – extending clinical trial excellence to the routine care of each oncological patient.

Related Resources

Related Resources

Hands holding a glass lung

Comparison of iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 for Evaluating Immunotherapy in Melanoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

In a retrospective study conducted at the University Hospital Cologne, the radiological criteria iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 were compared for assessing…

Image shows graphic related to study's research on iRECIST and RECIST

University Hospital Cologne: Comparison of iRECIST and RECIST 1.1 for Evaluating Immunotherapy in Melanoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A retrospective study conducted at University Hospital Cologne compared two criteria for assessing therapeutic response to immunotherapy: iRECIST and…

Doctors holding up puzzle pieces

Developing Standardized Reporting Templates for Sarcomas: Insights from Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Kunz

Sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that pose significant challenges in both diagnosis and treatment. Within the framework…