A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Enhancing flexibility and communication while saving costs and time in clinical trials
Emily Ferris and Alex Arbuckle describe how using mint Lesion™ has enhanced their clinical trial operations, enabling “a more cooperative approach…
University Hospital Jena: Next-level Workflow Optimization in Clinical Trials
How to set up a well-running clinical trial center that can handle up to 40 trials at once has been successfully demonstrated by Laura Graziani, study…
Structured Reporting of Solid and Cystic Pancreatic Lesions in CT and MRI: Consensus-Based Reporting Templates of the German Radiological Society (DRG)
During the daily clinical routine, radiological reports on pancreatic lesions are often written as freeform texts. This causes several problems, in…