A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Brainlab and Mint Medical Enter Cooperation with the German Society for Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery
Today Mint Medical together with Brainlab entered into a cooperation with the German Society for Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery (DGOOC) and its…
Study confirms a vital need for structured radiology reporting
Free-text report often lacks both content and clarity, burdening referring physicians with the time-consuming and cumbersome task of finding and…
Advancing Childhood Cancer Research by Providing the Path to Structured, Mineable, AI-ready Data
Modern technology advancements, specifically in the area of medical imaging, have substantially improved the evaluation of therapy response and the…