A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Potential of longitudinal data from single site and multi-center clinical trials for AI-research
Prof. Dr. Hans-Christoph Becker from Stanford University, a long-standing user of mint Lesion™, shares his experience of using the software in this…
Home of excellence for cancer care innovation
In a multidisciplinary center that networks medical research, natural sciences, engineering sciences, computer science and business administration, in…
Royal Marsden London: Study shows prediction power of CT-based 2D and 3D texture analysis for liver metastases
In a retrospective study [1], a team from Royal Marsden in London and Sutton explored changes of CT texture analysis metrics in unresectable liver…