A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Mint-Data for Personalized Medicine at Cancer Center in Tübingen/Germany
Compiling structured real-world-data from different medical disciplines, such as molecular genetics, laboratory medicine, pathology or radiology, to…
Number of Clinical Trials in Oncology has increased strongly during the last 10 years
Cancer cases and cancer related deaths continue to increase globally. While new cancer therapies are being identified offering new options for…
New TNM- and RADS-Classification in mint Lesion
With the aid of various clinical reading templates, mint Lesion provides context-specific support in the application of established radiological…