A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Challenges and Opportunities of Setting Up a Comprehensive Oncological Imaging Database
In an exclusive interview with Prof. Dr. Thorsten Persigehl, a leading expert in Oncological Imaging, we delved into the transformative radCIO project…
Interview with Prof. Thorsten Persigehl on the radCIO in Cologne
Structured data in radiology is crucial for accurate diagnoses and treatment planning and serves as the basis for detailed clinical practice and…
Study with mint Lesion™ compares the Efficacy of SIRT and CS-PHP in Uveal Melanoma with Hepatic Metastasis
A study conducted by researchers at University Hospital Tuebingen retrospectively compared two liver-targeted therapies for uveal melanoma patients…