A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Challenges and Opportunities of Setting Up a Comprehensive Oncological Imaging Database
In an exclusive interview with Prof. Dr. Thorsten Persigehl, a leading expert in Oncological Imaging, we delved into the transformative radCIO project…
Challenges and Opportunities of Setting Up a Comprehensive Oncological Imaging Database
Structured data in radiology is crucial for accurate diagnoses and treatment planning and serves as the basis for detailed clinical practice and…
Study with mint Lesion™ compares the Efficacy of SIRT and CS-PHP in Uveal Melanoma with Hepatic Metastasis
A study conducted by researchers at University Hospital Tuebingen retrospectively compared two liver-targeted therapies for uveal melanoma patients…