A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
University Hospital Tuebingen: Study compares the Efficacy of SIRT and CS-PHP in Uveal Melanoma with Hepatic Metastasis
A study[1] conducted by researchers at University Hospital Tuebingen retrospectively compared the efficacy of two liver-targeted therapies,…
University Hospital Munich (LMU): Study Analyzing the Tumor Growth Rate as a Prognostic Biomarker in Lymphoma Patients Under CAR T-Cell Therapy
A recent study[1] conducted by researchers at the University Hospital Munich (LMU) investigated the role of tumor growth rate (TGR) in predicting the…
Advancing Neuro-Oncology Assessments: Mint Medical to Integrate Newly Published RANO 2.0 Criteria into mint Lesion™
Glioblastomas and other gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumor types, yet few effective therapies are available. Clinical research…