A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
mint Analytics: Real-time data visualization and analysis in clinical trials with imaging endpoints
We talked to PD Dr. Wolfgang G. Kunz, Head of Oncological Imaging and of the Oncological Study Center at the Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital…
University Hospital Cologne: Study provides guidance values of iodine concentration for body CT examinations
Using data from a large cohort of individuals without radiological tumor burden, researchers from University Hospital Cologne have conducted a study…
Private Practice KölnTriangle: Catapulted into a New Orbit of Reporting
With mint Lesion™, “complex information is condensed so that it is easier to understand. We believe that this way, we can make the complex central…