A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Mint Medical provides a reading template for the standardized assessment and documentation of COVID-19 disease (coronavirus) based on CT imaging
In the first week of March, we will make the relevant software functions available for all our current users at no cost. We plan to offer the COVID-19…
Mint Medical provides a reading template for the standardized assessment and documentation of COVID-19 disease (coronavirus) based on CT imaging
Heidelberg, GER – Mint Medical GmbH, a global MedTech company specialized in software solutions for data-driven radiology, today announced that it…
Clear, consistent, and complete documentation of imaging-derived information
The radiology report is expected to provide information that impacts life changing treatment decisions at every cancer care step in which imaging is…