A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
SLK Clinics Heilbronn: Oncological Therapy Assessment and Efficient, Structured Reports in Daily Routine
As a clinic group with almost 1500 beds, the SLK Clinics Heilbronn are the largest healthcare provider in the Heilbronn-Franconia region. The clinic…
Project „KoMed“: The cognitive medical assistant for risk and complication prevention
Funded by the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Mint Medical has been supporting the Heidelberg University Hospital as…
Structured reports for better patient care in oncology
“mint Lesion™ enables us to make better reports because it truly provides all the necessary data for patient care.” Dr. Laurent Chapuis shares how…