A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
University of Miami & Nova Souteastern University: Study shows feasibility of radiomics and T2 mapping as novel imaging biomarkers of activity in superficial fibromatosis
A retrospective study [1] conducted by researchers at University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Nova Southeastern University investigated…
The benefits of structured oncologic reporting with mint Lesion™
Dr. Damiano Caruso of Sapienza Universita di Roma recounts how he got to know mint Lesion™ at a workshop hosted by the ESOI. Among other workstations,…
mint Lesion™ 3.8. Release: What’s New?
The recent 3.8 release brings with it a multitude of new features and refinements that further facilitate reporting, interdisciplinary collaboration,…