A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Transforming Oncology Patient Care
Innovative Approach to Structured Routine Reporting with mint Lesion at the University Hospital Zurich Heidelberg, DE, 05/09/2023 - Mint Medical…
University Hospital Jena: Research Investigating the Viability of Accelerating Whole-Body MRI in Children and Adolescents through STIR DWI with Simultaneous Multi-Slice Excitation
This study[1] addressed the challenges of conducting WB-MRI in paediatric patients, particularly the prolonged acquisition time required for…
WUSTL: Discrepant Assessments of Progressive Disease in Clinical Trials between Routine Clinical Reads and Formal RECIST 1.1 Interpretations
In this retrospective study utilizing the mint Lesion™ software[1], researchers found that routine clinical interpretations frequently resulted in the…