A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center: Study shows variable correlation of change in DIPG tumor size among different measurement strategies
A recent prospective study [1] conducted by researchers at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center compared manual 2D, semi-automated 2D, and…
Creating evidence to tackle COVID-19
Our COVID-19 reading template is in use for two weeks, and its usage is multiplying. We are grateful for the close cooperation and feedback from…
Potential of using structured data from clinical trials and routine for AI and radiomics research
Dr. Nils Grosse Hokamp shares his experience of using mint Lesion™ at the University Hospital Cologne in this brief interview. He talks about how they…