A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Real-world data to enhance clinical trial evidence
In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a vast proportion of patients does not meet the precise inclusion criteria. In oncology, for example,…
Improving interdisciplinary communication when using PI-RADS v2.1
Dr. Robert McFarland shares his experience of using mint Lesion™ at his radiology practice in this brief interview. He talks about the challenges of…
University Hospital Tübingen: Study shows prediction power of clinical and CT imaging biomarkers
A recent retrospective study [1] conducted by researchers at University Hospital Tuebingen focused on identifying imaging and clinical predictors of…