A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
LMU Munich: Prospective study shows the suitability of a semi-automatic approach to assess changes in prostate MRI after prostatic artery embolization
A prospective, monocentric study [1] conducted by Vanessa F. Schmidt and her colleagues at the University Hospital Munich (LMU) evaluated the…
Structure, Gather, and Share Data Faster with the mint Lesion™ Browser-Based Application
Whether in clinical routine, in clinical trials or in clinical research, mint Lesion™ is a reliable and strong supporter of its users’ individual…
RACOON: A revolutionary project with all German university hospitals in the University Medicine Network (NUM)
The idea of aggregating clinical data from different sources, processing it in a structured way and using it for joint research may not be new, but…