A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.

Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources

Customizable reading templates for therapy response assessment
mint Lesion offers customizable reading templates for therapy response assessment in clinical care and research. Adapt parameters, define lesion…

Insights into the BZKF BORN-Project – Interview with Dr. Mandy Wahlbuhl-Becker
The Bavarian Oncological Radiology Network (BORN) is enhancing cancer diagnostics in Bavaria through standardized imaging and structured reporting. …

The Bavarian Oncological Radiology Network – Standardized Imaging for Improved Cancer Care: Interview with Dr. Mandy Wahlbuhl-Becker
The Bavarian Oncological Radiology Network (BORN) aims to support patients and medical professionals across Bavaria by standardizing imaging…