A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Heidelberg University Hospital: Key Imaging Features to Distinguish Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms from Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs), or Frantz tumors, are rare pancreatic tumors accounting for 2-3% of all pancreatic neoplasms. These tumors…
2,237 Patients, 11 Hospitals, four HCC Criteria: A Comparison Study
A recent study, conducted across 11 South Korean hospitals, compared the diagnostic performance of four hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnostic…
Multicentric Study: Comparison of Diagnostic Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Recent advancements in MRI techniques and tumor biology have led to updated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnostic guidelines from various liver…