A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Developing Standardized Reporting Templates for Sarcomas: Insights from Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Kunz
Sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that pose significant challenges in both diagnosis and treatment. Within the framework…
Standardized Reporting Template for Sarcomas in the BZKF BORN-Project: Interview with Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Kunz of LMU Munich
Sarcomas are a rare and highly diverse group of malignant tumors that affect both soft tissue and bones, posing significant challenges due to their…
RACOON FADEN Project Tackles Early Detection of Adenomyosis
Endometriosis is a vastly under-researched condition affecting women, but it is finally receiving the attention it deserves through the RACOON FADEN…