A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Closing the Care Gap by Shaping the Future of Evidence-Based Medicine
Healthcare still lags behind other economic sectors in terms of digitalization. Despite significant advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic…
Three Key Benefits of Structured Reporting in Daily Clinical Routine
In this short interview, Dr. Remy Geenen from Northwest Clinics in Alkmaar, Netherlands, shares his personal mint Lesion™ experience, where he talks…
Fostering Consistent Application and Interpretation of the Treatment Response Criteria Across Europe and Beyond
Last week Mint Medical supported an ESOI-EORTC joint hands-on course on imaging in assessing response to cancer therapy - a yearly event that took…