A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
RACOON: A revolutionary project with all German university hospitals in the University Medicine Network (NUM)
The idea of aggregating clinical data from different sources, processing it in a structured way and using it for joint research may not be new, but…
High-quality annotated data in clinical routine
The desire to standardize reporting and to get even more out of their oncological images led to the partnership of the Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep in…
Raising our awareness in pediatric cancer
The terms rare, uncommon, infrequent are commonly used to describe the occurrence of cancer in children – from a prevalence perspective, “only”…