A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Key Imaging Features for Differentiating Rare Pancreatic Tumors
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN), also known as Frantz tumors, are rare tumors of the pancreas. Due to overlapping features of SPN and pancreatic…
Heidelberg University Hospital: Key Imaging Features to Distinguish Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms from Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs), or Frantz tumors, are rare pancreatic tumors accounting for 2-3% of all pancreatic neoplasms. These tumors…
2,237 Patients, 11 Hospitals, four HCC Criteria: A Comparison Study
A recent study, conducted across 11 South Korean hospitals, compared the diagnostic performance of four hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnostic…