A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
RACOON FADEN Project Tackles Early Detection of Adenomyosis
Endometriosis is a vastly under-researched condition affecting women, but it is finally receiving the attention it deserves through the RACOON FADEN…
Use of Multiparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Prospective Study
The prospective study conducted by LMU Klinikum München investigates the effectiveness of vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) and…
LMU Klinikum Munich: Monitoring Prostate Cancer Treatments with VTP and HIFU - The Use of Multiparametric MRI
The prospective study conducted by LMU Klinikum Munich investigates the treatment of localized prostate cancer using two techniques: vascular-targeted…