A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
University Hospital Cologne: Study provides guidance values of iodine concentration for body CT examinations
Using data from a large cohort of individuals without radiological tumor burden, researchers from University Hospital Cologne have conducted a study…
Private Practice KölnTriangle: Catapulted into a New Orbit of Reporting
With mint Lesion™, “complex information is condensed so that it is easier to understand. We believe that this way, we can make the complex central…
Mint in 30 Minutes - How to adopt radiomics research, clinical trial management, and cognitive assistance in clinical routine
During this year’s virtual ECR 2020, we provided an insight into data-driven radiology with our Mint in 30 Minutes webcast. Using live software…