A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Hands-on with mint Lesion™ at ESOI Autumn Workshop in Munich
It was a great pleasure to participate at the Autumn Workshop of European Society of Oncological Imaging (ESOI), that took place in Munich from…
James, please!
Intelligent, context driven assistance systems guide users in a standardized way through the reading process and generate all relevant information on…
HCC Profiles
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requires thorough evaluation of the tumor stage to ensure precise prognosis and clear treatment recommendations,…