A recent study conducted at UKE Hamburg compared manual and software-assisted assessments of computed tomography (CT) scans according to iRECIST (immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in oncological patients undergoing immune-based treatment. Utilizing mint Lesion™ for software-assisted assessment, the study found that software-assisted assessments resulted in shorter reading times, lower error rates, and higher inter-reader agreement compared to manual assessments. The researchers thus concluded that software-assisted iRECIST assessments are preferable over manual approaches for optimal oncological response evaluation.
Software-Assisted CT Assessment Outperforms Manual Methods in Oncology Study
Related Resources
Related Resources
Data Analytics and Instant-Trial Research
Context-driven read procedures in mint Lesion™ facilitate the generation of well-structured data on a large scale. At RSNA 2016, Mint Medical presents…
Leipzig shines as new host for German Radiology Congress
4 days full of sun – there couldn’t be any better circumstances for Leipzig to present itself as new host of the German Radiology Congress. Mint…
ECR 2016 in Vienna – Structured Reporting awakens
The ECR 2016 in Vienna achieved a new record in number of participants: 25.998 people visited the congress. Mint Medical also realized a personal best…