Stay Informed: Transforming Radiology with Structured Reporting and Data-Driven Approaches

Dive into our activities, projects, and product updates. Catch on the latest industry news and learn who we are as a company and as a team.

Medical personnel looking at a technical device to discuss diagnostic guidelines

2,237 Patients, 11 Hospitals, four HCC Criteria: A Comparison Study

A recent study, conducted across 11 South Korean hospitals, compared the diagnostic performance of four hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnostic guidelines and readers' judgments.

The study was retrospective, involving 2,237 patients at risk for HCC with 2,445 focal liver lesions (FLLs). FLLs were reviewed according to four guidelines: AASLD/LI-RADS, KLCA-NCC, EASL, and APASL, assessed on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Read more about the study here.

Related Resources

Related Resources

WUSTL: Discrepant Assessments of Progressive Disease in Clinical Trials between Routine Clinical Reads and Formal RECIST 1.1 Interpretations

In this retrospective study utilizing the mint Lesion™ software[1], researchers found that routine clinical interpretations frequently resulted in the…

A doctor pushes a lying patient into the LDCT device

Early lung cancer detection through LDCT screening as a potential way to improve patient outcomes in Germany

The establishment of a nation-wide lung cancer screening program in Germany has been a subject of considerable interest and debate among healthcare…

A screenshot of a structured report from mint Lesion™

Tumor Growth Rate Modeling: A Novel Approach to Evaluating the Efficacy of Cancer Therapies

The 2020 review of Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administrative Approval of Novel Cancer Therapies Between 2000 and 2016…