Stay Informed: Transforming Radiology with Structured Reporting and Data-Driven Approaches

Dive into our activities, projects, and product updates. Catch on the latest industry news and learn who we are as a company and as a team.

Medical personnel looking at a technical device to discuss diagnostic guidelines

2,237 Patients, 11 Hospitals, four HCC Criteria: A Comparison Study

A recent study, conducted across 11 South Korean hospitals, compared the diagnostic performance of four hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnostic guidelines and readers' judgments.

The study was retrospective, involving 2,237 patients at risk for HCC with 2,445 focal liver lesions (FLLs). FLLs were reviewed according to four guidelines: AASLD/LI-RADS, KLCA-NCC, EASL, and APASL, assessed on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Read more about the study here.

Related Resources

Related Resources

mint PI-RADS V2 report as the standard for communication with urologists - Interview with PD Dr. Röthke

Since the beginning of 2017, all PI-RADS v2 reads are exclusively performed with mint Lesion™ by PD Dr. Matthias Röthke, Chief Medical Officer at…

Assessment time halved: Importance of a good tumor response assessment tool in clinical site reads

The Clinical Research Imaging Core (CRIC) of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (UWCCC) recently published a poster at the AACI CRI…

Study - free text reporting vs. mint Lesion in clinical routine

Free text reporting in the tumor response assessment of radiologic imaging data is common in clinical routine, whereas in clinical trials standardized…