How to improve reading procedures and reduce errors in clinical trials with imaging endpoints

Dr. Laura Oleaga from Hospital Clinìc de Barcelona explains how she and her team have benefitted from implementing mint Lesion™ in the face of an increasing volume of clinical trials. She highlights how standardized reading procedures and reports limit the possibility of errors in clinical trial work, improve the communication between radiology and oncology, and deliver the necessary documentation for trial audits.

 
Moreover, she decsribes the potential that arises by using mint Lesion™ in their clinical routine – extending clinical trial excellence to the routine care of each oncological patient.

Click here or on the image above to watch the full video on YouTube.

Related Resources

Related Resources

Screenshot of the mint Lesion interface showing RANO 2.0 configuration, tumor burden calculations, and structured neuro-oncology assessment tools.

Implementing RANO 2.0 for Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials in mint Lesion

Tumor response assessment in neuro-oncology clinical trials requires careful attention to measurement protocols and confirmation scan requirements. To…

Image of a patient getting an MRI scan, signifying how RACOON projects in Germany show how imaging, structured reporting, and AI jointly advance clinical research.

RACOON – Imaging, Data & Collaboration for Better Decisions

Modern radiology faces a central question: how can imaging and clinical data be combined in a way that leads to more precise diagnoses,…

Interview with Prof. Timm Denecke about the RACOON-MARDER project and AI-powered early detection of liver cancer using MRI

Rethinking Early Detection: How RACOON-MARDER Aims to Spot Liver Cancer Sooner

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often diagnosed too late, limiting treatment options and survival. The RACOON-MARDER project aims to change that. By…