How to improve reading procedures and reduce errors in clinical trials with imaging endpoints

Dr. Laura Oleaga from Hospital Clinìc de Barcelona explains how she and her team have benefitted from implementing mint Lesion™ in the face of an increasing volume of clinical trials. She highlights how standardized reading procedures and reports limit the possibility of errors in clinical trial work, improve the communication between radiology and oncology, and deliver the necessary documentation for trial audits.

 
Moreover, she decsribes the potential that arises by using mint Lesion™ in their clinical routine – extending clinical trial excellence to the routine care of each oncological patient.

Click here or on the image above to watch the full video on YouTube.

Structured Reporting Clinical Trials Standardized Reading Procedures Therapy Response Assessment Video

Related Resources

Related Resources

CRA requesting a radiology read using mint Lesion Clinical Trial Request Portal

Centralized Management for Clinical Trial Communications and Workflows

Requests for radiological clinical trial evaluations frequently rely on fragmented methods such as emails, phone calls, and spreadsheets. This…

Participants at the RECIST and Beyond workshop in Cologne during hands-on training with mint Lesion for structured tumor response assessment.

Successful “RECIST and Beyond” Workshop in Cologne: Advancing Precision in Oncologic Imaging

How can complex tumor findings be assessed accurately, reproducibly, and in line with clinical guidelines?

Screenshot of the mint Lesion interface showing RANO 2.0 configuration, tumor burden calculations, and structured neuro-oncology assessment tools.

Implementing RANO 2.0 for Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials in mint Lesion

Tumor response assessment in neuro-oncology clinical trials requires careful attention to measurement protocols and confirmation scan requirements. To…