jump to content jump to footer

How to improve reading procedures and reduce errors in clinical trials with imaging endpoints

Dr. Laura Oleaga from Hospital Clinìc de Barcelona explains how she and her team have benefitted from implementing mint Lesion™ in the face of an increasing volume of clinical trials. She highlights how standardized reading procedures and reports limit the possibility of errors in clinical trial work, improve the communication between radiology and oncology, and deliver the necessary documentation for trial audits.

 
Moreover, she decsribes the potential that arises by using mint Lesion™ in their clinical routine – extending clinical trial excellence to the routine care of each oncological patient.

Video Clinical Trials Standardized Reading Procedures Therapy Response Assessment Structured Reporting

Related Resources

Centralized Management for Clinical Trial Communications and Workflows
Requests for radiological clinical trial evaluations frequently rely on fragmented methods such as emails, phone calls, and spreadsheets. This…
mint Lesion usage during a clinical trial read, featuring the TGRM export tool.
Bridging the Gap Between RECIST and Survival: Why the FDA’s Analysis of the g Value is a Game-Changer
For decades, oncology trials have relied on RECIST 1.1 to evaluate drug efficacy. However, these categorical "snapshot" evaluations do not always…
Participants at the RECIST and Beyond workshop in Cologne during hands-on training with mint Lesion for structured tumor response assessment.
The two-day “RECIST and Beyond” workshop at radCIO Cologne offered intensive hands-on training on RECIST, iRECIST, mRECIST and LI-RADS, with real-case reporting performed directly in mint Lesion.
Successful “RECIST and Beyond” Workshop in Cologne: Advancing Precision in Oncologic Imaging
How can complex tumor findings be assessed accurately, reproducibly, and in line with clinical guidelines?