The Knowledge Hub for Medical Imaging Professionals: Transforming Radiology with Structured Reporting, Data-Driven Approaches and Multicentric Research

Access breakthrough research, innovative case studies and collaborative projects advancing radiology worldwide. Dive into our activities and product updates, and learn who we are as a company and as a team.

A radiologist reviewing the updated PCWG4 prostate cancer clinical trial guidelines.

From PCWG3 to PCWG4: Evolving Standards in Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials

The Prostate Cancer Working Group 4 (PCWG4) updates and extends the recommendations of PCWG3 to reflect a patient-centric approach, the emergence of advanced imaging technologies, and the need for serial biological profiling in an evolving therapeutic landscape. 

 

Key Transitions in PCWG4 

 

1. Revised Nomenclature and Disease Modeling 

PCWG4 transitions from traditional "clinical state" models toward a therapeutic indication model. This involves replacing terms like "castrate-resistant" (CRPC) with language focused on Androgen Pathway Modulation (APM). 

  • APM-naïve (APMN) 

  • APM-sensitive (APMS) 

  • APM-resistant (APMR) 

2. Integration of PSMA-PET Imaging 

While CT and bone scans remain the standard for progression criteria, PCWG4 formally incorporates PSMA-PET for staging and evaluating disease distribution. The PCWG4 working group specifies that PET-based progression should be defined by new lesions rather than changes in SUV (Standardized Uptake Value). 

3. Updated Bone Scintigraphy Progression Rules 

To support the identification of rapidly progressing disease, PCWG4 introduces the "≥ 6 Lesions" Rule. 

  • If a restaging scan identifies six (6) or more new bone lesions relative to the first on-treatment scan, a confirmatory scan is no longer required. 

  • For five or fewer new lesions, the PCWG3 "confirmation rules apply. 

4. Serial Biological Profiling and Patient-Centricity 

PCWG4 advises dynamic characterization through metastatic or liquid biopsies at the start of therapy and upon progression to capture lineage plasticity and actionable alterations. Furthermore, the update focuses on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and increasing diversity in trial enrollment. 

5. Earlier Disease States 

The guidelines extend recommendations into earlier disease states, including APM-naïve/sensitive disease and settings where disease is detectable only by PET (nonmetastatic or PET-only settings). 

 

For further details and the complete framework, please refer to the original publication1DOI: 10.1200/JCO-25-02834

1 Andrew J. Armstrong et al. Trial Design and Objectives for Patients With Prostate Cancer: Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4. J Clin Oncol (2026)

Related Resources

Related Resources

Group photo of Mint Medical and mediaire team

Mint Medical and mediaire strengthen the prostate cancer care pathway with AI-Powered MRI Solutions

Mint Medical, a Snke company, and mediaire announce a collaboration to advance AI‑powered MRI workflows through the interoperability of mint Lesion…

CRA requesting a radiology read using mint Lesion Clinical Trial Request Portal

Centralized Management for Clinical Trial Communications and Workflows

Requests for radiological clinical trial evaluations frequently rely on fragmented methods such as emails, phone calls, and spreadsheets. This…

Standardized response criteria evaluation in mint Lesion featuring the TGRM module.

From Theory to Practice: Evaluating g-values within mint Lesion

Following the FDA’s recent analysis of the growth rate constant (g) as a prognostic marker1, the challenge for many research organizations is…